Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space 1026

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Space 1026

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article; I can't figure out how to rewrite it but perhaps someone can. If not, I don't see any alternative to deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It reads tremendously of promotion, however, don't expect that to mean much. Just litter it blisteringly with arbitrary sources, then steam over anyone who wonders about it, and claim everyone who questions the neutrality of the material as biased. Works wonders from what I hear :) Should that fail, it's a candidate for deletion because of it's apparent promotional nature. Яεñ99 (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 23:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. JoshuSasori (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh. Let's be bold here and stop the relisting and just delete it. Rationales are listed. Яεñ99 (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.